Hi: Sorry I have forgot to mention that our company provides our own implementation of JMS on top of Rendezvous, so it can be treated as another JMS implementaion.
Fan -----Original Message----- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Help needed regarding to org.activemq.network.jms package Hi Fan On 31 Jan 2006, at 20:34, Li, Fan wrote: > Hi: > > First of all, my apologies for spamming your e-mail account, but I am > looking for help from any ActiveMQ developer who can help me answer a > couple of questions. > > I am currently working on a Project that would help our company to > switch our existing messaging applications to used ActiveMQ instead of > our own messaging system that is based on Rendezvous. Note that Rendezvous does not implement the JMS API, so the JMS bridge won't do. We need an explicit JMS <-> RV bridge to handle pure Rendezvous. (TibCo has a JMS provider as well but that isn't the same thing as Rendezvous and their JMS provider needs to be bridged to RV). Is it really RV you need or Tibco JMS? FWIW I'm not sure if we are allowed to host an RV bridge in the Apache project as it would depend on TibCo RV APIs (though I guess its no different from depending on specific JDBC drivers etc) - but I have started an experimental transport for ActiveMQ which talks native TibCo RV if you are interested; I'll try put a distro of it some place. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
