On 3/28/06, Mats Forslöf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Hiram, > > > Even so it might be better to be a bit overzealous to prevent namespace > clashes :) >
I would like to make this c++ lib, feel very c++ like, I don't want it to smell like it came from a Java shop. So I think it's better to have short names like most of the other libs out there. > If ASF does not have any rules about this we'll change it - no problem. > However, if we're to sync the names between C# and C++ the C# name spaces > should be altered also!? > > C# > namespace cms > namespace activemq.command > namespace activemq.core > namespace activemq.io > No.. becaue the C# one alos works for VB.NET and J# etc. etc. that's why the interface are in the .NET Message Service (NMS) namespace. Also .Net uses Camel case convention in it's namespaces. So we will do it like that. Once again the aim is to have a .NET library the feels very native. > C++ > namespace cms > namespace activemq::command > namespace activemq::io > namespace activemq::marshal > namespace activemq::protocol > namespace activemq::transport > namespace activemq::util > This looks good to me! > Regards, > Mats > -- Regards, Hiram
