This is one point of the proposal I floated last week: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: ErinO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 10:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 4.0 RC1 - durable topic > > > Hi, James: > > Thanks for the explanation. The configuration flag will do > for my case. > > But I thought the purpose for the durable topic is to remove > the order dependency between the producer and the consumer. > Also for a message to be durable means it shouldn't get lost > in any circumstances, if someone didn't turn on the > configuration flag you are going to add, he could lose > messages in this specific case. > > In my opinion, it is better to fix the issue than just adding > a configuration flag. > > Thanks. > > Erin > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-4.0-RC1---durable-topic-t142625 6.html#a3846446 > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com. >
