Hi Mats, The fields of a command may have changed, but I don't think any of the marshaller generators have changed. So re-running the openwire marshaller code generators should take care of the problem.
BTW: On the java side we have developed test cases where each command type gets marshaled to a file. This file can act as a reference for the other languages. It should be possible to marshall a command in c++ and compare it to the contents of the file. Should help detect when and on which commands the c++ marshaller get out of step with the Java ones. On 4/20/06, Mats Forslöf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hiram, > > Please specify what has changed in the protocol, it would save us a lot of > time if someone could post these changes to the mailing list, if it already > has been posted sorry for not observing it! > > Regards, > Mats > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino > Sent: den 19 april 2006 19:51 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: openwire-cpp question > > On 4/19/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey David, > > > > I was able to build this code on Sun Workshop 8, I had to put some OS > > dependant condition checks, like you have for MACOS and have to modify code > > a little bit here and there nothing major. > > > > I am able to run it with AMQ-RC2 but when I tried to run it with latest > > SNAPSHOT (04/18) it was getting stuck after receiving BROKER_INFO command. > > > > Wireformat may have changed a little.. perhaps we need to regenerate the > openwire marshaller for c++ > > > I am not sure if latest SNAPSHOT is having issues because I had the same > > problem with the STOMP C client it was getting stuck after sending the SUB > > command. > > > > There's been a small change to the stomp marshal ling. Before we were > inconsistently adding \n after the \0 frame terminator. So I changed the > activemq side to all ways consistently add the \n after the frame. > It also expects frames that are sent to it to also have the \n. > > I could rollback the requirement for frames that it receive have a \n, but I > think it would be better if the stomp protocol was a bit more consistent and > just did things 1 way. So this could be what has broken some of the stomp > clients. I've updated the c and ruby ones so that they work once again. > > > Thanks! > > > > Vik > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Fahlander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:03 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > This code compiles and runs on GCC 3, GCC 4 and Visual Studio 2005. We have > > never tried to compile it with Sun compiler. The code is tested and can > > communicate with text messages with the broker (as our test code does). > > > > Hope to get the time to make the code compile with more C++ compilers as > > soon as we get to a point where the code becomes complete. > > > > David > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: den 18 april 2006 23:37 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > Hi David, > > > > I tried that code earlier and ran in to build issues, there are lots of > > things in this code what Sun Compiler didn't liked. Is this code tested? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Vik > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Fahlander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:55 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Mats Forslöf > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > The latest code is of the openwire cpp client was uploaded as a jira patch > > at http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-656. The latest version is > > called "source 060406.zip". It contains the full source tree as well as > > make files and a test program. > > > > /David > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: den 17 april 2006 17:28 > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Mats Forslöf > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > Hi Mats, > > Is the code in svn your latest? I remember you including unit tests > > and makefiles at some point - did these get lost when the last patch > > was applied? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:08 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > There is no test stub either. I am wondering if someone ever tested it? > > > > Vik > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:01 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > Hmm ... that surprises me - I know the openwire-cpp team had included > > makefiles in the past. I believe the code should support linux, > > windows, & OSX. > > > > Does anyone know where the makefiles are? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 10:08 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question > > > > Hey Nate, > > > > I don't see any make file or something in there? Do you have any idea > > what O/S version and C++ complier this code recommends? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Vik > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nathan Mittler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:16 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: openwire-cpp question > > > > The latter - It's a client-side library. The same is true for the > > Stomp CMS lib and the openwire .NET lib. > > > > Regards, > > Nate > > > > On 4/16/06, vik Dhawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I wanted to know the use of Development branch on SVN at > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/openwire-cp > > > p/ > > > > > > Is this a C++ implementation of ActiveMQ? is it complete? or is it > > > can > > be > > > used as a C++ library so some application can use classes in this > > library > > > to > > > connect to a remote AMQ server? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/openwire-cpp-question-t1459989.html#a3945792 > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > -- Regards, Hiram
