ok. On 6/14/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > So here's a link to everything that is in the spec currently: > http://stomp.codehaus.org/Protocol > > It's a WIKI so you can edit it and improve the spec. I think that a > the big missing piece in the spec is that there is no specification of > how STOMP messages get mapped to JMS messages. Since this is missing, > there is no provider independent way of sending JMS messages from > STOMP. Since every implementation could map a STOMP message to JMS > messages differently. > > I think we need to add a "STOMP Message to JMS Message Mapping" > section that providers SHOULD comply with if the provider also > implements a JMS interface. The great part is since this is missing, > you can make this whatever you want! Appendix, not part of the spec itself. If for no other reason than ActiveMQ will not be compliant as the current hackjob I implemented and we are now discussing how to fix is definitely not spec-worthy =) Once we have a few implementations and people have worked with it we can consider moving it from appendix into stomp 1.1 proper. Enshrining one technique now would be like enshrining a set of rules for O/R mapping eight years ago. -Brian
-- Regards, Hiram
