On 11/15/06, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
> for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
> has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
>
> We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version.
> Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will
> figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also
> run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look
> into that until we actually jump to Java 5.
>
Rather big move for a minor version - why not call it ActiveMQ 5 instead
(It'll even align!).
lol.. good point. But I'd hate to have big increases without big
functionality changes especially if the clients are still compatible
with the 4.x stuff.
Then keep ActiveMQ 4.x on 1.4.
Regards,
Endre.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
