Note that jmx was enabled, so that i have seen mbeans
being created / destroyed for each message sent using jca outbound
(one of them was the advisory consumer iirc).  That may be related to cpu
usage.

On 12/3/06, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Guillaume!

I'll look at why it's so cpu intensive to create a connection +
session + producer on the broker side

cheers,

Rob
On 3 Dec 2006, at 18:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

> Over the past days, I worked on improving the connection pooling in
> ActiveMQ, mainly for outbound.  I found that:
>  * the o.a.a.pool package has a limited throughput when using
> persistence
>     messaging, because all threads reuse a single connection, but
> the broker
>     will handle the messages sequentially, so the throughput of
> using a single
>     transaction in multiple threads is the same as using a single
> thread.
> * the activemq resource adapter used for outbound is really slow
> (using
>    jencks), because the connection is completely reset after each
> use.  The
>     connection infos need to be sent each time + creation of an
> advisory consumer
>     on the connection, + createion of the session + creation of a
> producer.  These
>    operations are very cpu intensive on the broker side (no real idea
> why).  I think
>    this should be improved by pooling sessions / producers.
>
> For my current needs, I have enhanced the o.a.a.pool package to
> support
> enlisting the current session in an active xa transaction, and by
> allowing
> several connections to be used to raise the global throughput.
> I have also added in jencks a derived pooled connection factory which
> is compatible with jencks jca inbound support (the main problem is
> that
> the XAResource#isSameRM need to work and recognize that the inbound
> connection and outbound connection use the same RM).
>
> My last thought is that i wonder if the org.apache.activemq.pool
> package
> should be in its own module because it has its own set of dependencies
> in addition to the standard jms client (commons-pool mainly) which can
> lead to problems with classloaders.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to