I am under the impression that the open wire protocol should always be able to maintain backward compatibility. Does this mean that we will never change the major version ;-)
On 1/23/07, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Rob Davies wrote: > The latest development is being done on ActiveMQ 4.2 - however > there are a lot of improvements between 4.1 and 4.2 - namely: > > 1. Use of Java 5 > 2. Message cursors for persistent messages > 3. Spooling of temporary messages id broker memory is full > > and to be delivered in the next couple of weeks: > > 1. New very fast journal message store - that we good to be the > default > 2. Improvements to message flow control - to take into account the > spooling and cursors > > Given the above - I'd like to propose that the 4.2 release is re- > versioned to 5.0 and that we deliver a number of milestone releases > first - before GA -1, We have, thus far, used major version numbers to mean incompatible wire protocol changes, not "impressive new features" and I would like to maintain that. -Brian
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/) Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
