Definitely

James

On 3/29/06, Westelinck, Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess this one does not contain the bugfix for messages that have already 
> been taken from the queue are being redelivered after a broker restart. This 
> fix has been done yesterday. Will this be in rc2 then?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 29/03/2006 18:30
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Query the number of messages from a Queue
>
> I'd recommend using 4.0-RC1 now which is looking very solid.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0-RC1/
>
> James
>
> On 3/29/06, Westelinck, Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. M4 contains nasty bugs. Use the snapshot instead.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrian Tarau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed 29/03/2006 18:21
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Query the number of messages from a Queue
> >
> > That's great, but is active 4.0 M4 stable enough?
> >
> > James Strachan wrote:
> > > On 3/29/06, Adrian Tarau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I didn't say that JMX is a bad approach(JMX is great), just I image  a
> > >> simple java  call, ActiveMQManager.getMessagesCount(Queue queue) do to
> > >> the job.
> > >>
> > >
> > > You can look up all of these interfaces in JMX and use them as a POJO...
> > >
> > > http://activemq.codehaus.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/package-summary.html
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > http://activemq.codehaus.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/DestinationViewMBean.html
> > >
> > >
> > >> I'm in 3.2.2, so could you be more specific, where I can find the stats?
> > >>
> > >
> > > There are none in 3.x; this is why we've been working on 4.x for the
> > > past year to add all of these stats :)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > James
> > > -------
> > > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
> > If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 
> > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> > individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> > disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
> > If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 
> > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> > individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> > disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
> you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
> message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
> you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
> message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>


--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Reply via email to