On 4/10/06, ssozonoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> Thanks, is this sort of functionality exposed in Mule when using JMS as the
> transport?

Its exposed to any JMS client application; whether using the JMS API
directly or some abstraction on top

> I am still trying to evaluate if there is any reason for me to
> look at using mule instead of straight out JMS/ActiveMQ.

Sepends on what you need to do.

If you are just writing POJOs and want to hide the JMS API stuff you
might wanna use Lingo

http://lingo.codehaus.org/

--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Reply via email to