Good idea. Perhaps we should make it a byte[] so that it's even more generic.
On 4/18/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess we could consider adding an extra securityToken String to the > ConnectionInfo to allow folks to pass additional (non-JMS compliant) > ways of performing authentication. Could you raise a JIRA for this? > > On 4/18/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It sounds to me like you could use the password field to hold both > > kinds of credentials if you use some fancy encoding. > > > > On 4/17/06, p. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > My client may pass the session_Id instead of the password, we need to > > > pass a > > > parameter and ask the broler just do the session validation instead of > > > authentication. > > > > > > thanks, > > > _parvin > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Refreshing-authorizationPlugin-config-t1368949.html#a3955968 > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Hiram > > > > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > -- Regards, Hiram
