James.Strachan wrote: > > Incidentally its worth remembering that the C# client is a set of > interfaces that can be implemented however you like - so its not like > you're tying your code to something ActiveMQ specific etc... >
Yes, I realise this. I have been playing with the c# client most of the afternoon and do have it working with the tcp:// transport. I am now looking at the transport section to figure out what all is going on. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Long-lasting-transactions-t1474194.html#a3993022 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
