Hi Reza,

this is good feedback - something that has changed between activemq 3.x and 4.0 is that by default messages sent from a MessageProducer now wait for a receipt from the message broker that the message has been received. So a property you could set on your Connection Factory is to set useAsyncSend = true.

I'd be interested to know if this makes a difference for you.

cheers,

Rob

On 23 Apr 2006, at 15:25, reza aliakbary wrote:

Dear Rob, The current snapshot performs better than RC2 but still it is too slower than 3.2.2 . With a benchmark in the same environment I got the following times:
  3.2.2 ----> 8 sec.
  SNAPSHOT ----> 43 sec.
  RC2 --- > 77 sec.

  So you see the diffrence is a lot(8 vs 43).

  Thanks,
  Reza

Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: could you try the latest snapshot: http://cvs.apache.org/repository/
incubator-activemq/distributions/  - I've only started  ActiveMQ 4.0
has only started in the past week :)

On 23 Apr 2006, at 08:06, reza aliakbary wrote:

Dear James, I also tested with RC2 but it is still slow. We are
interested of the features you provided in version 4.0 but we
don't  want to loose performance. I hope you would reach to the
performance of  3.2.2 in next releases of 4.0 .

  Cheers,
  Reza


James Strachan  wrote:  Which version of
4.0 are you testing? FWIW we've only recently started
tuning 4.x heavily, certainly SVN HEAD is looking quite good.


On 4/22/06, reza aliakbary  wrote:
Hello,

 I used a simple benchmark to compare the performance of 3.2.2 vs
4.0 . I
suprised why 3.2.2 performs very better than 4.0, I thought I
could be wrong
or maybe my configuration has a problem but I couldn't find
anything bad in
configurations(I used default and without persistency). I have
attached
codes that I used. Please let me know why 3.2.2 performs better
than 4.0.
The benchmark works with a queue asynchronously.
 Run the consumer to register consumers and them run the producer.

 Best Regards,
 Reza


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/



---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.



                
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Reply via email to