On 5/3/06, Danielius Jurna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sending message to a topic will add additional load to the broker, anyway > this kind of solution is only a quick work-around.
Though to be honest sending an empty message every 5 seconds or so (when the client is not doing much) to a non-durable topic with no consumers has very little overhead. Having additional keep-alive command in stomp client would be appreciated. > Even more, I think stomp protocol cannot be used in production for > consuming > messages without this feature. Well; the ActiveMQ server can disable the inactivity timeout and so just rely on TCP timeouts instead. But given the unreliability of TCP timeouts in complex networks, the keep alive is a great option. I chatted on IRC with Brian and I think we managed to convince him to add it to the STOMP protocol as a verb. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
