there's no replication at the OS level, if that's what you're asking. no NFS magic at all, actually. i've even tried putting the journals in box1:/tmp/foo, box2:/tmp/bar, box3:/tmp/baz, etc.
so, each journal is a different directory, in that it resides on a different machine. it just seems weird that i can start box[1], then box[2], but box[3] fails due to the aforementioned issues. any other suggestions? --- James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/5/06, ptomsic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i've got 3 machines where i'm trying to cluster > activemq brokers. > > i can get 2 to start up just fine, but the third > box starts up and says, > > "Journal is already open..." then "Could not > connect to local URI: > > vm:?network=true" > > > > why do 2 machines successfully link, but the third > blows up? > > any thoughts? > > Are you using different file system areas for each > broker? From the > config file, using your home directory - does that > get replicated > across the machines causing the error? > > Basically each broker has to have its own directory > to store its > journal files etc. The error indicates that you have > 2 brokers sharing > the same files. > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Journal+is+already+opened+by+this+application > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >
