James.Strachan wrote: > > On 6/16/06, red3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What about queue clean up? Are we correct in assuming that temporary >> queues >> should be cleaned up when no longer in use? > > Temporary queues should be deleted when the connections close. > >
Is it possible that in the request/response scenario of Lingo that the response is coming back though a different broker to the one the request was made through, and that the client is not receiving the response through the broker the original request was made on, thus timing out? (We sometimes see "Destination no longer exists" errors.) Or. perhaps, the temporary queue is being removed too quickly? Or, more generally, do you see any fundamental issues with using Lingo as a client to a Broker Network? Are the two compatible? Alan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Temporary-Queue-behaviour-with-Networks-of-Brokers-t1796463.html#a4939867 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
