On 7/25/06, Javier Leyba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You could monitor the servers via JMX. Maybe we could get the slave to
> send out an advisory when it becomes the new master so folks can
> subscribe to an advisory for such things?
>
> Incidentally if you have a shared file system or are happy sacrificing
> some performance for pure JDBC and avoiding the high performance
> journal you can use auto-failover where you can run as many slave
> brokers as required and there is no broker-broker synchronisation
> required...
>
> http://activemq.org/site/jdbc-master-slave.html
> http://activemq.org/site/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
>
James
Thanks for your reply.
I' m a little bit confused with those new features you told me.
So those 2 new master slave options do not need any manual recovery
(since there is no replication at the broker level, they both rely on
a shared resource (database or file system) so you don't have to have
an operational procedure to bring back old masters.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
