On 8/9/06, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have a question about using JMS in Web Clustering, which is going to be our usage case in the near future. Currently for ActiveMQ, the failover is done on the client side by FailoverTransport, all the states are kept in the memory. If we make the state objects (ConnectionState, SessionState etc.) serializable, so that if one Web Server is down, another Web Server can use these serialized objects and go from there. will this be a feasible solution? Or there are some betters ways to support ActiveMQ in Web Clustering case.
I don't quite follow what you are trying to do. Could you explain your use case a little more please? -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
