James, do you mean push the priority consumption to a number of consumers dedicated to just priority consumption? I understand that solution but unfortunately it's not optimal for the architecture I'm currently working on. I'm certainly interested in an activemq ordering of a queue based on the jms priority id though if it ever comes up as an extension or addition. Thanks much for the info, appreciate it.
James.Strachan wrote: > > On 8/16/06, cmose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is there a current snapshot that supports the correct behavior of message >> priority on a queue? I've got a july 26 snapshot of 4.1 that does not >> appear >> to support that functionality. > > We don't automatically reoorder queues into priority order right now. > Though you can use selectors to for example have a pool of threads in > multiple JVMs which just process high priority messages - which is > often more predictable and safer than getting ActiveMQ to perform > reordering of temporary dispatch buffers etc. > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-currently-a-version-that-supports-JMS-priority-id-on-Qs--tf2114799.html#a5835122 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
