What's the mechanism used to select one versus the other, say "pure master slave" vs "shared file system master slave", assuming there's a shared file system.
Thanks. Chanaka James.Strachan wrote: > > I've updated this page to make it more obvious the difference. I"ve > referred to the non-shared-filesystem/jdbc as 'Pure Master Slave' and > provided a table comparing the different approaches to make it a > little less confusing... > > http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html > > On 8/21/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/21/06, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Thanks for the reply. >> > >> > In this link http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html, it >> mentioned >> > that "in ActiveMQ 4.1 or later you can use a <masterconnector> ...", >> but >> > if slave won't replicate master's state, I guess that config element is >> > not needed, right? >> >> That element is not used for JDBC master/slave. >> >> Pure Master/Slave is different to JDBC Master/Slave and Shared File >> System Master/Slave. <masterConnector> only applies to pure >> Master/Slave >> >> -- >> >> James >> ------- >> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >> > > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-topology-in-4.1-tf2128538.html#a5928633 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
