Grea stuff Dave. I wonder could you provide a patch so we can see what changes you made?
On 8/23/06, Dave Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wanted to bring some closure to this since I started parallel discussion on the Geronimo Users Mail List. This has been identified as a Geronimo Bug. It is believed, but I did not personally verify, that this bug does not exist in Geronimo 1.1. What happened is I was using ActiveMQ and another XAResource with GeronimoTransactionManager. This bug occurs when a participating XAResource throws an XAException during the prepare phase of the commit process. The transaction cleanup process actually threw the exception I discovered. ActiveMQ was behaving exactly as it should have in this scenario. It was GeronimoTransactionManager that did not have as required. To resolve this I finally patched and built my own GeronimoTransactionManager since waiting for a new Jencks/ActiveMQ build compatible with the latest Geronimo isn't in the cards. I can help other identify how to accomplish this if needed. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION-on-rollback--tf2124313.html#a5935379 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
