I wonder, does using the actual destination name work? Am wondering if wilcards are not quite supported?
On 9/4/06, nkiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I use a networkconnector to connect two java apps (named "prim" and 'sec") that both have an embedded broker. I have some queues that I want to be forwarded, and some others (named e.g. "local.q1") that I don't want to be forwarded. There are "local.q1" queues on both "prim" and "sec", but they are completely unconnected. I tried to implement that using <networkConnector name="sec" uri="static://(tcp://sec:61618)" failover="true"> <excludedDestinations> <queue physicalName="local.>"/> </excludedDestinations> </networkConnector> However, I see a partial "spill-over": some messages written to "local.q1" on "prim" show up in "local.q1" in "sec". Am I doing something wrong here? Best, Norbert -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AQ-4.0.2-snapshot-networkconnectors-excludedDestinations-problem-tf2213226.html#a6129794 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/