I wonder, does using the actual destination name work? Am wondering if
wilcards are not quite supported?

On 9/4/06, nkiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

I use a networkconnector to connect two java apps (named "prim" and 'sec")
that both have an embedded broker. I have some queues that I want to be
forwarded, and some others (named e.g. "local.q1") that I don't want to be
forwarded. There are "local.q1" queues on both "prim" and "sec", but they
are completely unconnected.

I tried to implement that using
      <networkConnector name="sec" uri="static://(tcp://sec:61618)"
failover="true">
        <excludedDestinations>
          <queue physicalName="local.>"/>
        </excludedDestinations>
      </networkConnector>

However, I see a partial "spill-over": some messages written to "local.q1"
on "prim" show up in "local.q1" in "sec".  Am I doing something wrong here?

Best,
  Norbert

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/AQ-4.0.2-snapshot-networkconnectors-excludedDestinations-problem-tf2213226.html#a6129794
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.




--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Reply via email to