I think I'd actually prefer a protocol id that looks something like this:
stomp+ssl:// On 10/18/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, oferhalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anybody have any ideas on how to add transport level security to the > Stomp connector? > Is it down to configuration, or is this feature simply not available (yet)? Its more a case of we've never tried yet. From the Java server side of the fence it should be fairly simple to provide a stompssl transport which reuses the ssl transport but uses the stomp wire format. I wonder if there's a stomp client we can experiment with on the SSL side of things? Maybe the ruby client? -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
