Hiram, thanks. I am not sure I follow what you are saying 100%, but I am using persistant messaging, and am using jms.useAsyncSend=false. Thus, I am pretty sure my messages are sent synchronously, right?
Hiram Chirino wrote: > > are you sending a non persistent message or a message within a > transaction? > > If you are, then those messages are sent async. The > jms.useAsyncSend=true option is only used to relax the JMS requirement > that persistent messages be sent sync. > > Regards, > Hiram > > On 10/31/06, massive.boisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am using AMQs securty with ssl authorization and authentication >> features >> provided by recent changes to AMQ 4.1. So I am in fact using what Sepand >> and >> my collegue ngcutura have done recently. >> >> When I send a message to queue that I have no privilages to neither >> create >> nor write to (the queue does not even exist to begin with), the call to >> amqProducer.send(myDest, jmsMessage) passes successfully! >> I only get exception throught exception listener. Obviously this is a big >> problem for me, because my program continiues to function as if all is >> ok, >> loosing the data from the message that it thought it sent. >> >> The url my clien connects to is: >> failover:(ssl://localhost:61616)?soTimeout=10000&connectionTimeout=0&trace=false&jms.closeTimeout=15000&jms.useAsyncSend=false&jms.copyMessageOnSend=false&jms.optimizeAcknowledge=false&wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=30000&wireFormat.stackTraceEnabled=true&wireFormat.tightEncodingEnabled=true >> >> Well long, but it does say: jms.useAsyncSend=false! >> >> The async exception I get is: >> javax.jms.JMSException: User KB is not authorized to write to: >> queue://APPLICATIONS >> at >> org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:46) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.onAsyncException(ActiveMQConnection.java:1487) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection$2.run(ActiveMQConnection.java:1460) >> at >> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650) >> at >> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) >> Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: User KB is not authorized to >> write >> to: queue://APPLICATIONS >> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native >> Method) >> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown >> Source) >> at >> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown >> Source) >> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.createThrowable(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:216) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightUnmarsalThrowable(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:176) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.ConnectionErrorMarshaller.tightUnmarshal(ConnectionErrorMarshaller.java:69) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.doUnmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:349) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:275) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:136) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) >> >> >> Any ideas what is going on? I looked for the similar bug on the JIRA, but >> found none. >> >> Is this intended behaviour? >> >> --MB >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/receiving-async-exception-when-not-appropriate-tf2545596.html#a7093182 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/receiving-async-exception-when-not-appropriate-tf2545596.html#a7306436 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
