We can only reproduce this on the production server while waiting for couple
of days :-)
But I wonder what "waiting to lock <0x0000002aa17df278> (a
org.apache.derby.impl.services.locks.SinglePool) " means? I cannot find that
object to be locked in any other thread. Is that possible?

But interesting thing is that 

James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> Whoah, that looks like a bug in Derby to me.  I wonder if its worth us
> upgrading to a newer Derby release. We're on 10.1.1.0 whereas it looks
> like Derby has released 10.2.1.6.
> 
> I wonder can you reproduce with a newer Derby jar?
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Consumer-deadlock--tf2635867.html#a7358200
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to