Hi Adrian, > Does using an actual consumer instead of a queue browser works?
I tried using a MessageConsumer instead of a QueueBrowser and the consumer got the message as expected As suggested by Marlon, I have uploaded code for the browser itself and a unit test for it and a few other supporting files The files are 1) http://www.nabble.com/file/4242/AQueueBrowser.java AQueueBrowser.java - this contains the code for the QueueBrowser 2) http://www.nabble.com/file/4243/MockQueueMessageSender.java MockQueueMessageSender.java - this sends a message to a queue 3) http://www.nabble.com/file/4244/MockQueueConsumer.java MockQueueConsumer.java - this is a simple consumer that gets messages from the queue 4) http://www.nabble.com/file/4245/QueueBrowserTest.java QueueBrowserTest.java - a JUnit test that tests two cases - sender+browser and sender+consumer. The sender+consumer case works as expected, however the sender+browser doesn't. Supporting files - http://www.nabble.com/file/4246/GatewayException.java GatewayException.java , http://www.nabble.com/file/4247/JNDIUtil.java JNDIUtil.java , http://www.nabble.com/file/4248/jndi.properties jndi.properties Could you please have a look and let me know if there is something incorrect in the code? Please let me know if you need more information. Thanks for all your help, Priya Try enabling JMX in your embedded broker and check if there are really messages being enqueued in the queue specified. Does using an actual consumer instead of a queue browser works? Priya Parvatikar wrote: > Hi, -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QueueBrowser-in-embedded-broker-not-getting-any-messages-tf2677079.html#a7470217 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
