Eric, in general yes. order is preserved. But there are some edge cases where it may not like if a client fails and you have multiple consumers on a queue. This do to the fact that all the messages that the failed client had will be redelivered to the other client, and the redelivered message may be out of order with respect to the message already delivered to the other client.
On 11/29/06, ewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sa w that, but it says that applies for topics and multiple publishers. My question is what is the dispatch policy for a single publisher on a distributed queue. Eric Marlon Santos wrote: > > Hi, > > To be sure, just enable the <strictOrderDispatchPolicy/> here's the url > for reference... > http://activemq.org/site/total-ordering.html > > > > ewood wrote: >> >> I am using AMQ version 4.1 with a topology consisting of two embedded >> networked brokers. I have only a single producer on one broker and a >> single consumer on the other and I am using persistent messaging. >> Question is, is there any gauranteed ordering in this situation? Can I >> be assured that the messages will arrive at the consumer in exactly the >> same sequence thay are sent, even if there is a timeout/network failure? >> Our testing seems to inidicate that ordering is always preserved, but I >> want to make sure. >> >> Regards, >> >> Eric >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ordering-on-distributed-queues-tf2720775.html#a7601886 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
