It should go to the head - but its worth writing a unit test to check thats the case :)
On 12/6/06, osian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Another question has cropped up, if, lets say, the consumer were to go down whilst processing a message, does the message it was processing go to the back of the queue, or remain as the fist to get handed out to the next consumer that is available? (the consumers are using auto acknowledge), Thanks, Osh James.Strachan wrote: > > On 12/6/06, osian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When using message groups (within 4.1), is there any way of guaranteing >> the >> order in which the messages, within a group, are processed by the single >> consumer? i.e. is there any way of setting a sequence on a message, and >> ensuring that it is processed in the order of 1,2,3,4 etc, or even 1,2,4 >> (if >> there is no 3 for a message group within ActiveMQ)? > > The messages are processed in the order in which they are sent to the > broker; so no need to explicitly number them. > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-Question-About-Message-Groups-tf2766866.html#a7720860 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
