I've tried 4.1.0 version, if messages are not consumed from the queue, memory usage in the broker still increases untill out of memory exception is thrown.
rajdavies wrote: > > In 4.0.2 the index for messages was held in memory in Kaha - this is > not the case in later releases - please try http://www.activemq.org/ > site/activemq-410-release.html > > cheers, > > Rob > > On 29 Dec 2006, at 16:06, Danielius Jurna wrote: > >> >> Hi. >> >> Currently I'm evaluating kaha persistance and I have few questions. >> 1. It seems that flow management for fast producers doesn't work >> (it may be >> normal due to different persistance nature comparing to journaled >> store) >> 2. It seems that index for messages is held in memory, so broker >> can endup >> whith OutOfMemoryException on slow consumers. >> >> I was testing kaha which comes whith AMQ 4.0.2. Messages were sent >> to queues >> without transactions. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Kaha- >> persistance-and-memory-usage-tf2895222.html#a8088939 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Kaha-persistance-and-memory-usage-tf2895222.html#a8277130 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
