Hi James trying hsqldb it seems that the dialect you use for locking isn't handled. This is the same than http://www.nabble.com/Database-Locking-issues-tf2617111.html#a7303705 any plan to patch it? Using useDatabaseLock="false" works BTW.
James.Strachan wrote: > > On 1/12/07, drvillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> HI James >> >> no I haven't tried, since my specs require to have all embedded, but if >> it's >> for isolating the problem I can try. >> Do you think hsqldb would do better? > > I don't think so but by all means try it if you like. I've never > really considered hsqldb as a 'real' database for massive amounts of > data ;) I figured folks just used it for testing. > > If nothing else, trying mysql / postgresql or some other external > database (preferably on the same box) and it would at least narrow > down the problem. I've heard reports of Derby hogging RAM and slowing > down with large databases. > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/performance-degradation-tf2925875.html#a8299113 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
