I'm not sure what client you're using, but I assure you it isn't
activemq-cpp. For one, there is no class AMQTopic. Perhaps you're using
the openwire-cpp client? Or maybe the amazon client?
On 1/25/07, Lalit Nagpal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I try to REPLY BACK to a message like this (using getCMSReplyTo and
creating
a Topic)
AMQTopic* replyTempTopic = new
AMQTopic(message->getImplMessage()->getCMSReplyTo().c_str(), false,
topic,
session->getImplSession());
AMQTopic constructor internally does a
this->implTopic = session->createTopic(topicName);
Running a bstat on the command line gave me the stats where I could see
some
topics being registered like
Type = Topic
ConsumerCount = 0
Destination = /topic/{8E0DC228-7E66-493B-AD03-132BA75E315A}
BrokerName = localhost
DequeueCount = 0
EnqueueCount = 5
and some topics being registered like
Type = Topic
ConsumerCount = 1
Destination = System.Service.Login
BrokerName = localhost
DequeueCount = 0
EnqueueCount = 38
NOTE:: {8E0DC228-7E66-493B-AD03-132BA75E315A} in the above topic was a
random id generated for a topic - since CMS does not currently support
TemporaryTopics .... we create Topics with a random id like this to make
it
behave like a TemporaryTopic
The difference here is that certain topics get started with /topic/ and
some
topics do not. This creates a mismatch between the topic names ... The
result is clearly seen in my Enqueue count ... it is 38 ... Messages are
not
being dequeued ...
I think this is happening because of the name mismatch when creating the
topics at the receiving end for giving a reply.
The complete output of bstat is attached as a txt - my messages are not
getting dequeued
Any suggestion would be really useful.
Thanks
Lalit Nagpal
CSA, SunGard
http://www.nabble.com/file/5922/bstat-op.txt bstat-op.txt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/topics---activemq-cpp-tf3102054.html#a8609019
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
