Christopher, Do you really need to be arrogant in all your emails?
I don't post here regularly but follow this list and its responses like yours which makes such mailing lists unfriendly and drives people away. Please learn how to be a little more patient / friendly in instead of talking down to people in all your responses. Sanjiv On 1/29/07, Christopher G. Stach II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cafe wrote: > Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you: > My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100 > clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and receiving > these files. Now my questions are: > 1-What happen if a connection is lost when the files are being sending or > receiving? > 2-What about the performance of activeMQ when it most manages these > transfers simultaneously? > > > Christopher G. Stach II wrote: >> cafe wrote: >>> sorry, the question is about Stream >>> >>> cafe wrote: >>>> Is so good ActiveMQ's InputStream? >>>> >>>> My question is, if is better for transfer files between 300 MB and 500 >>>> MB >>>> using activeMQ's InputStream or to do that manually the programmer? >>>> >>>> Is more reliable let do the transfer to activeMQ? >>>> >>>> >> What else would it be about? >> >> I haven't seen any objective performance comparisons, so that just >> brings up more questions. >> >> 1. How much will it cost to design and implement your own strategy vs. >> using JMS/AMQ? >> 2. How well will AMQ perform compared to a generic file transfer >> implementation? >> 3. How much will the infrastructure for your implementation cost vs. >> AMQ's? >> 4. Will either serve your application's needs? >> etc. etc. etc. >> >> -- >> Christopher G. Stach II >> >> >> > 1. The message would be lost. What else would happen? Use transactions and resend. 2. See my original email. -- Christopher G. Stach II
