From: Tonuzi Selim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That is what I expect.
>
> I have done some benchmarking on smaller files but I
> did not see any time difference between the 2 coding
> styles.
>
> I am just wondering if these 2 codes are interpreted
> in the same way by perl when it uilts its bytecode.
If you run the script with
perl -MO=Deparse
perl will parse and compile it and then convert the bytecode back to
Perl code and print it:
C:\WINNT>perl -MO=Deparse -e "$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME}=
{isINPUTof=>[$1], isOUTPUTof=>[$2]};"
$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME} = {'isINPUTof', [$1], 'isOUTPUTof', [$2]};
-e syntax OK
vs.
C:\WINNT>perl -MO=Deparse -e "$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME}->{isINPUTof} =
[$1];$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME}->{isOUTPUTof} = [$2];"
$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME}{'isINPUTof'} = [$1];
$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME}{'isOUTPUTof'} = [$2];
-e syntax OK
So no, there is a difference.
Jenda=========== [EMAIL PROTECTED] == http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz
==========
When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed
to get drunk and croon as much as they like.
-- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery
_______________________________________________
ActivePerl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
