On May 10, 2007, at 04:48, Preston de Guise wrote:
> (Oh, and my request for what ActiveState should be working on?  
> While slightly off-topic, I'd love an option in PDK on Mac OS X to  
> _not_ produce Universal binaries, and allow the person running  
> perlapp to nominate universal/ppc/intel. I know UB's are cool, and  
> would like to offer both PPC and Intel versions separately.  
> Compiling on a Linux vs a Mac OS X host, my distributions go from  
> 45MB (Linux) to ~90MB ...)

I have not tried this myself but I would think it should be possible  
to run the 'lipo -remove ppc' on the binaries in the ActivePerl  
distribution before you package up your application with perlapp.  It  
might be worth a try. Having an option to perlapp to do this for you  
when it package up the binary would be much nicer, especially if you  
need to build both ppc and i386 binaries from the same machine.

Running 'lipo -remove' on the binary that perlapp produce would not  
be effective as lipo has no way of accessing the binary objects that  
are embedded inside the binary.

Regards,
Gisle

_______________________________________________
ActivePerl mailing list
ActivePerl@listserv.ActiveState.com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

Reply via email to