I second that. Export is a very useful. But since we are using rails 2.2.2, we can't use it. If it is only 200 lines difference, it would be really nice to add it.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Ana <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have created a branch of Active Scaffold on Github, and integrated > the functionality of Active Scaffold Export within it. > > http://github.com/ananelson/active_scaffold_export/ > > I took this step because I was unable to update active_scaffold_export > to work with the latest version of active_scaffold (I got stumped by > trying to get the frontends/ directory to be visible to ActionView). > When I stopped to think about it, I realized that much of the code in > ASE is only there because it is a separate plugin from AS. > > I realize there is probably a wish to keep AS as small as possible, > but unfortunately due to the nature of the plugin, it is very > difficult to bolt functionality on to it with additional plugins. I'm > getting CLOC statistics of 7989 total lines of code before adding in > Export functionality, and 8191 after adding it in. > > I personally depend on Active Scaffold Export, and I would like to see > it eventually made part of the core functionality of Active Scaffold. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
