On Martes, 2 de Febrero de 2010 11:50:55 Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. escribió: > On Martes, 2 de Febrero de 2010 09:01:01 [email protected] escribió: > > Hi, > > > > if you are using current version of activescaffold I would recommend > > to also take a look at using named scopes: > > > > http://wiki.github.com/activescaffold/active_scaffold/api-list > > def named_scopes_for_collection > > end > > I'm thinking in rework this like in inherited_resources, with a > beginning_of_chain method which defaults to active_scaffold_config.model. > > Then you can overrride in the controller to use another thing, for example: > def beginning_of_chain > current_user.partner.users > end > > Or override to use named scopes, for example: > def beginning_of_chain > active_scaffold_config.model.vegetarian.older_than(20) > end > > A shorter version, using super: > def beginning_of_chain > super.vegetarian.older_than(20) > end
I have looking at current code, and really it's the same as override model_with_named_scope and removing named_scopes_for_collection I think it's easier becaues it's the same code structure as in plain rails instead of learning an special language to define what scopes to use. Maybe it's more flexible, although I'm not sure there are something impossible to define with named_scopes_for_collection. Currently named_scopes_for_collection it's not used for find_if_allowed, which is used for edit, show and delete actions. I think it should use the same named scopes, it shouldn't be slower becaues it's loading with a primary key, and it would check the same restrictions as in listing. > > > -- > > Volker > > > > On 1 Feb., 20:29, Brian Cardarella <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @kenny, > > > > > > Awesome, that worked. Thanks! > > > > > > On Feb 1, 12:51 pm, Kenny Ortmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > *****If AS depends upon my route then it might be useless for what > > > > I'm doing AS does not depend on your route... It tries to do nice > > > > things for you depending on your route, but it doesn't have to do > > > > those things. > > > > > > > > Inside of your controller you can specify the conditions for the > > > > records... > > > > > > > > def conditions_for_collection > > > > end > > > > > > > > There is an example > > > > herehttp://wiki.github.com/activescaffold/active_scaffold/api-list > > > > > > > > The way AS is written you can override almost anything that you want > > > > so you should be able to do all of the admin stuff you want using it. > > > > It might be frustrating at first but once you have it figured out > > > > for one controller you will know how to do it for the rest. > > > > > > > > ~Kenny > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Brian Cardarella > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Ah, useless is not the best choice of words. I like AS for doing > > > > > full Admin stuff but limiting the scope of the retrievable records > > > > > has been frustrating. > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 1, 12:34 pm, Brian Cardarella <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > @kenny > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, the point is to limit access to a company's set of users > > > > > > for the company admin. This is a trivial thing in Rails and I'm > > > > > > not certain why it has to be so difficult to do in > > > > > > ActiveScaffold. > > > > > > > > > > > > If AS depends upon my route then it might be useless for what > > > > > > I'm doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 1, 12:24 pm, Kenny Ortmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Well it depends... Active scaffold does some nice things for > > > > > > > you out of > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > box... > > > > > > > for instance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are on they users - partners page, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > url/users/5/partners > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and you have active scaffold configured for the partners > > > > > > > controller, it > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > try to load only that users partners. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But if the out of the box stuff does not work the way you want > > > > > > > it to > > > > > > > > > > you can > > > > > > > > > > > > define this method in your controller > > > > > > > > > > > > > > protected > > > > > > > def conditions_for_collection > > > > > > > conditions = {:partner_id => current_user.id > > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your situation is a little different because you have a > > > > > > > has_many > > > > > : > > > > > :through > > > > > : > > > > > > > relationship so you might have to tweak the conditions but you > > > > > > > can get > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Brian Cardarella < > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > So I'm trying to replace some Admin stuff with > > > > > > > > ActiveScaffold. For example, I have this in a particular > > > > > > > > controller: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > def index > > > > > > > > @users = current_user.partner.users > > > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > def show > > > > > > > > @user = current_user.partner.users.find(params[:id]) > > > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to replicate this behavior in AS? Everything > > > > > > > > I've read points to no, that it will take into consideration > > > > > > > > all records > > > > > > > > > > instead > > > > > > > > > > > > > of a specific portion of records. Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > > > > > > Google > > > > > > > > > > Groups > > > > > > > > > > > > > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > > [email protected]<activescaffold%2B > > > > > > > >un subscr...@go oglegroups.com> > > > > > > > > > > <activescaffold%2bunsubscr...@go oglegroups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, > > > > > send email to > > > > > [email protected]<activescaffold%2Bunsubs > > > > >cr i...@go oglegroups.com> . > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] -- Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
