Hi, There is no reason for it, it s just that you had to choose between the two options... Seems it was the wrong decision. :-)
-- Volker On Jun 10, 1:04 am, Kenneth Ortmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any reason that the en.rb, de.rb, and fr.rb locale files have not > been switched to yaml format? > > I'm running into issues with ruby 1.9.1, rails 2.3.8 and the latest version > of active scaffold, when I try to run tests it fails because of some of the > characters in those files. > > Just as a proof of concept I deleted the de.rb and fr.rb files, converted > the en.rb file to en.yml and fixed the format and then I have no problems > running my tests. > > I don't know much about how the locale stuff works, so is there any reason > that they need to be ruby files instead of yaml files? > > If there is no difference then I'm just going to convert the de.rb and fr.rb > files to yaml format and push the fix up. > > ~Kenny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
