On Viernes, 17 de Septiembre de 2010 12:18:37 Andrey Voronkov escribió:
> config.actions.exclude :delete
>
> this string did the trick! but I do not understand why?

Don't you have a authorized_for_delete method in TeachingPlace model?

>
> 2010/9/17 Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. <[email protected]>:
> > On Viernes, 17 de Septiembre de 2010 11:51:55 Andrey Voronkov escribió:
> >> update, delete, show
> >
> > Try to remove those actions, do queries disappear?
> >
> >> 2010/9/17 Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. 
<[email protected]>:
> >> > On Viernes, 17 de Septiembre de 2010 11:36:16 Andrey Voronkov escribió:
> >> >> no I have not. No any authentication system (as cancan for example)
> >> >> authentication based on a namespaces. In each namespace there is
> >> >> BaseController that has :authenticate_dept_head! (it is an example
> >> >> for dept_head namespace)
> >> >
> >> > What action links are displayed for each row?
> >> >
> >> >> 2010/9/17 Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> >
> > <[email protected]>:
> >> >> > On Viernes, 17 de Septiembre de 2010 11:22:23 Andrey Voronkov 
escribió:
> >> >> >> can a conditions_for_collection makes department to load each
> >> >> >> time? but it has no sense.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > conditions_for_collection is only called to bulid the list query,
> >> >> > it isn't called for each row.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I can see query is issued in list_actions partial, so probably some
> >> >> > security method checks current_user.department. Have you defined
> >> >> > some action_authorized method in your controller, or
> >> >> > authorized_for_action method in your model?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Here is listing from the top of action processing if it helps. As
> >> >> >> an autientication system I use devise. And dept_head user belongs
> >> >> >> to department. But I think it should'n be checked on each row.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Processing DeptHead::TeachingPlacesController#index (for 127.0.0.1
> >> >> >> at 2010-09-17 19:09:40) [GET]
> >> >> >>   DeptHead Load (3.5ms)   SELECT * FROM "users" WHERE
> >> >> >> ("users"."id" = 4) AND ( ("users"."type" = 'DeptHead' ) ) LIMIT 1
> >> >> >>   Department Load (43.8ms)   SELECT * FROM "departments" WHERE
> >> >> >> ("departments"."id" = 1)
> >> >> >>   SQL (99.3ms)   SELECT count(DISTINCT "teaching_places".id) AS
> >> >> >> count_all FROM "teaching_places" LEFT OUTER JOIN "lecturers" ON
> >> >> >> "lecturers".id = "teaching_places".lecturer_id LEFT OUTER JOIN
> >> >> >> "positions" ON "positions".id = "teaching_places".position_id
> >> >> >> WHERE (("teaching_places"."department_id" = 1))
> >> >> >>   TeachingPlace Load (4.7ms)   SELECT "teaching_places".* FROM
> >> >> >> "teaching_places" WHERE (("teaching_places"."department_id" = 1))
> >> >> >> ORDER BY "teaching_places"."id" ASC LIMIT 30 OFFSET 0
> >> >> >>   Lecturer Load (3.7ms)   SELECT * FROM "lecturers" WHERE
> >> >> >> ("lecturers"."id" IN
> >> >> >> (11,6,7,12,8,13,9,14,15,16,17,1,2,18,19,3,10,4,5))
> >> >> >>   Position Load (1.7ms)   SELECT * FROM "positions" WHERE
> >> >> >> ("positions"."id" IN (1,2,3))
> >> >> >> Rendering template within layouts/application
> >> >> >> Rendering list
> >> >> >> Rendered _list_header (26.4ms)
> >> >> >> Rendered _list_column_headings (35.9ms)
> >> >> >> Rendered _messages (2.4ms)
> >> >> >> Rendered _list_messages (186.4ms)
> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record_columns (12.6ms)
> >> >> >>   CACHE (0.0ms)   SELECT * FROM "departments" WHERE
> >> >> >> ("departments"."id" = 1) Rendered _list_actions (75.7ms)
> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record (121.6ms)
> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record_columns (4.4ms)
> >> >> >>   CACHE (0.0ms)   SELECT * FROM "departments" WHERE
> >> >> >> ("departments"."id" = 1)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2010/9/17 Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> >> >
> >> > <[email protected]>:
> >> >> >> > On Viernes, 17 de Septiembre de 2010 01:29:30 Andrey Voronkov
> >
> > escribió:
> >> >> >> >> This is an example of N+1 error in my case:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> CACHE (0.0ms)   SELECT * FROM "departments" WHERE
> >> >> >> >> ("departments"."id" = 1) Rendered _list_actions (26.8ms)
> >> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record (34.9ms)
> >> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record_columns (4.4ms)
> >> >> >> >>   CACHE (0.0ms)   SELECT * FROM "departments" WHERE
> >> >> >> >> ("departments"."id" = 1) Rendered _list_actions (26.9ms)
> >> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record (33.4ms)
> >> >> >> >> Rendered _list_record_columns (4.3ms)
> >> >> >> >>   CACHE (0.0ms)   SELECT * FROM "departments" WHERE
> >> >> >> >> ("departments"."id" = 1)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > If you are excluding department column, why is department
> >> >> >> > loaded? Is it used in some override? In a security check? Anyway
> >> >> >> > you can override active_scaffold_includes:
> >> >> >> >    def active_scaffold_includes
> >> >> >> >      @active_scaffold_includes ||= [:department]
> >> >> >> >    end
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 2010/9/17 Andrey Voronkov <[email protected]>:
> >> >> >> >> > I have model TeachingPlace that belongs to Department and to
> >> >> >> >> > the Lecturer models and has table field called position. I
> >> >> >> >> > want to rid off N+1 SQL requests. There is no N+1 if
> >> >> >> >> > config.columns = [:lecturer, :department, :position]
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Person who works with this interface is a department agent so
> >> >> >> >> > I have this two methods:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > protected
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >  def before_create_save(record)
> >> >> >> >> >    if dept = current_dept_head.department
> >> >> >> >> >      record.department_id = dept.id
> >> >> >> >> >    end
> >> >> >> >> >  end
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >  def conditions_for_collection
> >> >> >> >> >    if @dept ||= current_dept_head.department
> >> >> >> >> >      {:department_id => @dept.id}
> >> >> >> >> >    else
> >> >> >> >> >      {:department_id => nil}
> >> >> >> >> >    end
> >> >> >> >> >  end
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > As you can guess I do not need to display department field in
> >> >> >> >> > list or anywhere in this interface because the user knows
> >> >> >> >> > what department he represents. But this:
> >> >> >> >> > config.list.columns.exclude :department
> >> >> >> >> > causes N+1 error. Is there any kind of descision of my
> >> >> >> >> > trouble?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> >> >> >> > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
> >> >> >> > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> >> >> > Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To
> >> >> >> > post to this group, send email to
> >> >> >> > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group,
> >> >> >> > send email to
> >> >> >> > [email protected]. For more options,
> >> >> >> > visit this group at
> >> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> >> >> > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
> >> >> > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >> > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to
> >> >> > this group, send email to [email protected]. To
> >> >> > unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >> > [email protected]. For more options,
> >> >> > visit this group at
> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> >> > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
> >> > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this
> >> > group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe
> >> > from this group, send email to
> >> > [email protected]. For more options, visit
> >> > this group at
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
> > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group,
> > send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this
> > group, send email to [email protected]. For
> > more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.

-- 
Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.

Reply via email to