What im trying now is setting up a different DB with all the view used in
the SP's created as tables and the view data imported.  I will then run
through index analyzer and try the SP's to see what perfomance increase I
get, will let you know.  Im not bothered about the structurly integrety of
this second DB as the data is imported in the first and QA'd before before
exported to the second 'live' DB where speed is the main concern.

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Timby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 18:22
To: ActiveServerPages
Subject: RE: Sql Server 2K



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel, to follow up, I have denormalized tables in order to gain
perfomance before. If your normalized tables are too slow for JOIN
operations, then you really don't have much of a choice. It is
acceptable to break the rules of normalization if you understand the
consequences, and the benefits are great.

Ben Timby
Webexcellence
PH: 317.423.3548 x23
TF: 800.808.6332 x23
FX: 317.423.8735
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.webexc.com

- -----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Field [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:09 AM
To: ActiveServerPages
Subject: RE: Sql Server 2K


Do you rely on the index Tuning Wizard from query analyzer to index
your
table?

Dan


- -----Original Message-----
From: Showbear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 15:58
To: ActiveServerPages
Subject: RE: Sql Server 2K


Dan, one of our apps has a SQL Server 2000 database in which some
tables
contain over 25 million rows.  Properly indexed, performance is - to
be
scientific - blink-of-an-eye fast.

HTH

- -----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Field [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:09 AM
To: ActiveServerPages
Subject: OT: Sql Server 2K


Hi all,

I have a fairly complex DB structure from which I query and return
XML
results.  The structure is working fine, but the query can be a bit
slow
as I have to query several differnt tables (Well comparatively slow,
running about 700-2000 ms).  I have created a lookup table which is a
single table with all the variables in it, the question is, this
table
is currently at 250,000 rows.  I have re-wrote the query to use this
yet, but is it better to do it this way rather than link across the 5
or
so tables?  The row count could easily get close to the 1million mark
in
the future.

Dan



_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet
Managed Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further
information visit http://www.worldcom.com

- ---
You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to
%%email.unsub%%



- ---
You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
%%email.unsub%%

_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet
Managed
Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information
visit
http://www.worldcom.com



_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet
Managed Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further
information visit http://www.worldcom.com

- ---
You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
%%email.unsub%%

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPUgcZ/nby1cCm2Q8EQI+UwCg5T1ZS4W708ipmwrYYwT6yX2Wye4AnRKh
hZv8ZueMf1MAgsMjtG9OrgkQ
=fRsG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



---
You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
%%email.unsub%%

_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet Managed
Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit
http://www.worldcom.com



_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet Managed Scanning 
Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.worldcom.com

---
You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to