me too! ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ActiveServerPages" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:18 PM Subject: RE: LIST ADMIN! Msg rejection problem - what gives?
> Yeah I've had the same problem. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris [mailto:15seconds@;dracoassociates.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:26 AM > To: ActiveServerPages > Subject: LIST ADMIN! Msg rejection problem - what gives? > > > Three messages posted to the list this morning have all appeared as they > should and been reposted back to me. > > However each of the three has been followed by TWO messages like the one > below. In this message, I have replaced all instances of the > combination of i,n,t,m,- with "xxxx-" so that this message will make it > onto the list. > > What gives? > > TIA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Internet.com [mailto:xxxx-admin@;list.15seconds.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Message rejected > > > Your message posting was rejected because the "<XXXX-" header was > detected in the body of the message you sent. > > This header is usually only included by automated email programs, such > as "vacation" programs. For this reason, Internet.com does not accept > messages which contain this header, because it is highly likely that > they are automated messages, and not appropriate for a mailing list. > > If you are receiving this message, it means that you accidentally set > off this safeguard, by including the "<XXXX-" text in your message. > > Please resubmit your email message, without including the headers of a > previous message (specifically, do not include the Message-Id line). > > --- > > For your convenience, the message is question is reproduced below: > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from lagardeinc01.lagardeinc ([65.16.26.43]) by > xxxx-dl.sparklist.com with SMTP (Internet.com WIN32 version 5.1); Tue, > 29 Oct 2002 07:41:37 -0700 > Received: from lagardeinc01.lagardeinc (LAGARDEINC01 [10.10.10.150]) by > lagardeinc01.lagardeinc with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail > Service Version 5.5.2650.21) > id VZ5SBBX0; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:46:35 -0600 > Received: by lagardeinc01.lagardeinc (Microsoft Exchange Connector for > POP3 Mailboxes 4.50.2113) with SMTP (Global POP3 Download) > id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 > 09:46:04 -0600 > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 24013 invoked by uid 8002); 29 Oct 2002 15:37:57 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO xxxx-dl.sparklist.com) (216.91.57.132) > by relay.greensoft.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2002 15:37:57 -0000 > From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ActiveServerPages" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: passing variable to function > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:28:58 -0500 > Message-ID: > <XXXX-77814-791069-2002.10.29-07.33.25--don#[EMAIL PROTECTED] > om> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 > In-Reply-To: > <XXXX-77379-790867-2002.10.29-07.08.04--15seconds#dracoassociates.com@li > st.15seconds.com> > Importance: Normal > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > List-Unsubscribe: > <mailto:%%email.unsub%%> > Reply-To: "ActiveServerPages" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Alexander, you're dealing with two people named Chris here. I sent you > the code with the Select Case. > > The reason you place the ASP tags inside the client-side function is to > tell the SERVER that you want it to execute the code contained within > them. That code uses Select Case to determine the value of fieldstatus > ON THE SERVER and then uses Response.Write ON THE SERVER to write out to > the CLIENT page being constructed just the code that is required when > fieldstatus matches one of a set of values. You seem to understand that > ASP processing gets done once on the server - to create the page and > send it to the client - and then subsequent processing happens on the > client but maybe you're not following that thought all the way through. > > As an aside before explaining further, I noticed after I sent my advice > that all three of your desired results whether fieldstatus is 1, 2 or 3 > are the SAME as below. > > <% ' this is processed by server > Select Case fieldstatus > Case 1 > Response.Write "window.IDfrm.IDradio2.disabled =true" > Case 2 > Response.Write "window.IDfrm.IDradio2.disabled =true" > Case 3 > Response.Write "window.IDfrm.IDradio2.disabled =true" > Case Else > ' whatever should happen if it's NOT 1,2,3!! > End Select > %> > > So here's another reason to use Select Case (aside from it being clearer > to read and slightly faster). You can do this: > > <% ' this is processed by server > Select Case fieldstatus > Case 1,2,3 > Response.Write "window.IDfrm.IDradio2.disabled =true" > Case Else > ' whatever should happen if it's NOT 1,2,3!! > End Select > %> > > The result of this code is that if the fieldstatus variable contains 1, > 2, or 3, then your CLIENT page code will look like this: > > Sub LinkClick() > Dim strDis > msgbox "YOU CLIKED ME!!! I will now pass the parameters", 64, "HEY!" > window.IDfrm.IDradio2.disabled =true End Sub > > Whereas if the fieldstatus variable does NOT contain 1, 2, or 3 then > your CLIENT code will look like this: > > Sub LinkClick() > Dim strDis > msgbox "YOU CLIKED ME!!! I will now pass the parameters", 64, "HEY!" End > Sub > > Note that the window disabled code is not written to the page at all, > because fieldstatus was not 1,2,3. I say again, since fieldstatus is > determined on the SERVER, then use it there to construct your client > code appropriately instead of having your client (a) getting code it > doesn't need in its page and (b) having the problem of getting your > SERVER's value into the CLIENT's memory space. > > Clear now? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tsiris Alexandros [mailto:a.tsiris@;telesoft.gr] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:02 AM > To: ActiveServerPages > Subject: RE: passing variable to function > > > > > But it's not going to be manipulated much if you hardcode your > > fieldstatus variable the way I showed you how... > > > > Chris Tifer > > > Yes, I am looking over tyhe cose again, and it seems better with the > case. > > However, I can't why you would place ASP tags in a function that's > decalred under vbscript??? > > >From what I know, it works for variables, but I fdont think you can > >actually > have complete ASP tags and process them server side on this function. > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to > %%email.unsub%% > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > %%email.unsub%% > > > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > %%email.unsub%% > > --- > You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > --- You are currently subscribed to activeserverpages as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
