Good morning Sally,
Hi Sally,
This is certainly not a simple question and answer.  Some of it depends on
these factors:

Will your management require the policy owners to participate?
Is your role one of influence?
In what way(s) will the policy owner benefit from having their policies
centralized?  Will they have greater visibility for their subject matter?
Will they have less maintenance work? Will they benefit from assistance in
the writing of the policies?
How might you respond to concerns that this change will take away to change
their policies when they need to?
How much time do they have to adjust to this transition?  How much of the
work would fall on their shoulders?

So, if we were starting over, I would begin with knowing who is backing the
change.  I guarantee you will need this individual or group at some point
in the process.

I would get the following pulled together before having the first
conversations:

1) The list of policy owners (can you tell and do they know it?) and a good
idea as to their volume of policies
2) The names of those policy owners who are the most influential
3) A preliminary assessment as to who might be the most resistant and who
would like support a change
4) A walk and talk document about the rationale for making the move, and
certainly, what's in it for them.

Without knowing how your organization operates, here are just some ideas as
to how introduce the change proposed.
1) Meet individually with each policy owner.  The great thing about this
approach is that it's very personal and if there is a lot of dissension,
there aren't several people jumping on the band wagon at the same time.
But it take time.
2) If you knew there would be quite a few supporters, then small group
discussions would be more efficient and the dissenters could hear their
peers be supportive.
3) If the total number of policy owners is small, then one group
conversation could happen.  Maybe it would work to have the top management
support introduce the change and then open up the flow for discussion.

Never, ever would I start with an email notification.

What problem(s) are you trying to solve?  This would be a natural question
for your owners to ask.  In their opinion, things might be rolling along
just fine and this change will just slow things down or add too much
bureaucracy.  I'd devote a slide on this topic alone.  I think it would be
good to show them what could be too (use a mockup of what you're planning,
show them other sites and other policies against which they might compare
what you have now, etc.)

*A Comparison*
A colleague of mine who left the University this fall for a big
corporation, who is also merging with another large international company,
started with having management support in place.   Each division had their
own template, own policies, and their own processes. She started out by
meeting with the vice president for each division and then directors with
operational responsibilities for policy.  When she met, she had the vision
which included expected benefits, sought to understand their local policy
development and approval process, and asked for their feedback/response to
the vision. Just to give you an idea as to effort, my colleague has just
launched the equivalent of a senior policy committee  She is working with
the technology group to develop or purchase a policy management tool and
creating the suite of standard templates.

She also said that it was really important to cement the definition of
policy and obtain agreement.

Best of luck!
Michele

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Maziarz, Sally <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Our policies are not currently centralized and I’m wondering if anyone
> can share strategies for getting policy owner buy-in to share their
> policies and agree to centralization (as a first step in the process).
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Sally
>  This email message, including any attachments, is for the intended
> recipient(s) only, and contains confidential and proprietary information.
> Unauthorized distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, or are obviously not one of the
> intended recipients, please immediately notify the sender by reply email
> and delete this email message, including any attachments. Thank you.
>
> ATTN: Please be aware that when you respond to an ACUPA-L e-mail, the
> reply will be distributed to the ENTIRE list of members. If you do NOT want
> to send an e-mail to everyone, please reply directly to the individual who
> initiated the query (their e-mail address appears in the "From" line of
> their original e-mail).
>
> If you wish to remove yourself from the ACUPA e-mail list, please go to
> the following website and complete the form. We will remove you from the
> list within 24 hours, during normal business hours.
>
> http://www.acupa.org/MembershipForm_Discontinue.html
>
> If you have questions about the ACUPA e-list, please contact Jamie Parris
> at [email protected]
> <[email protected]?subject=ACUPA%20e-list%20assistance> or
> 607-255-6837.
>
>


-- 
Michele Gross, Director
University Policy Program
University of Minnesota
356-1 McNamara, 200 Oak street
Minneapolis, MN  55454
612-624-8081

http://policy.umn.edu/

Reply via email to