Everyone,

          Sorry for the typos.  I have not had a chance to drink my lunch yet!

Chris

Chris Knieriem
Potomac Computer Care
920 National Highway
Cumberland, MD 21502
301-777-3914
[email protected]

From: Chris Knieriem [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Active Directory Admin Issues
Subject: [MALWARE FREE][MALWARE FREE]RE: Need more IP addresses

Jeff,

          To better answer your question I would like to have some information 
on your network topology.  For example, you can add additional subnets such as 
192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0 with the addition of a router or two.  Do you use 
DHCP?  Are there any remote offices?

          If you are using DHCP and add additional subnets you will need to 
configure your routers to forward DHCP requests of make available a DHCP server 
on each subnet.  DHCP requests are sent initially as broadcasts and therefore 
do not pass through routers by default.  In the old days we used DHCP relay 
agents on out NT 4 boxes to facilitate DHCP requests or use a multihomed server 
(2 NICS with one on each subnet).  Whew what memories.

Chris

Chris Knieriem
Potomac Computer Care
920 National Highway
Cumberland, MD 21502
301-777-3914
[email protected]

From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:52 PM
To: Active Directory Admin Issues
Subject: [MALWARE FREE]Need more IP addresses

*DOUBLE POST*  I sent this to the NT System Admin Group too.

I am in need of more IP addresses on my network.

My current network looks like this:
192.168.1.x
255.255.255.0

I am using 248 IP's currently, so I have very little expansion available.  I do 
see the potential to increase in the following year, so I had better get my 
butt thinking about this soon.  Plus I have Christmas and New Year's holidays 
that I could work with no one on our network for 3 full days.

I am thinking about changing my subnet to something like 255.255.254.0 or 
255.255.252.0.  Would this be a good way, or would I be better adding an 
additional router and just creating a new 255.255.255.0 network on 192.168.2.x?

I guess my question is which is the "correct" way?

Jeff Johnson
Systems Administrator
714-773-2600 Office
714-773-6351 Fax
[cid:[email protected]]






~ NEW: CounterSpy Enterprise: Centralized Antispyware - #1 in eWEEK Test! ~

    ~    ~

No malware was found: NETGEAR ProSecure Web/Email Security Threat Management 
Appliance has scanned this mail and its attachment(s).

~ NEW: CounterSpy Enterprise: Centralized Antispyware - #1 in eWEEK Test! ~

    ~    ~

No malware was found: NETGEAR ProSecure Web/Email Security Threat Management 
Appliance has scanned this mail and its attachment(s).

~ NEW: CounterSpy Enterprise: Centralized Antispyware - #1 in eWEEK Test! ~

    ~    ~

No malware was found: NETGEAR ProSecure Web/Email Security Threat Management 
Appliance has scanned this mail and its attachment(s).


No malware was found: NETGEAR ProSecure Web/Email Security Threat Management 
Appliance has scanned this mail and its attachment(s).

~ NEW: CounterSpy Enterprise: Centralized Antispyware - #1 in eWEEK Test! ~
    ~  <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=400>  ~

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to