Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> Yes, there are many uses for discriminated record types.
Surely. But I think his question was not about untagged discriminated record
types per-se, but rather about derived untagged discriminated record types
with changed discriminants. A construct which is *much* less useful, and is
almost certainly not useful enough to justify the substantial definitional
and implementation pain associated with it.
Randy.
________________________________________________________
You have received this message because you subscribed to the Ada-Comment
mailing list. To leave the Ada-Comment list, send an email with
'leave Ada-Comment' in the body to [email protected]. For help
on the other commands available, send 'help Ada-Comment' to the same address.
Problems? Send mail to [email protected]. This list is operated by the
Ada Resource Association, Inc., PO Box 8685, New York NY 10116-8685.
