Hi Randy et al.
Old John is just putting the final touches to his updated Ada book. Should be done this week. Then I will be free to do some reviewing. Cheers John From: Christoph & Ursula Grein <[email protected]> Sent: 09 March 2024 18:55 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ada-Comment] AI22-0055-1 and AI22-0097-1 Am 09.03.2024 um 06:33 schrieb Randy Brukardt: ... AI22-0055-1 (which is now approved and in Editorial Review -- I did quite a bit of rewriting of the details of the changes as many were incorrect [we don't want a Usage header in the middle of a list of notes!] But I'm done with that now, the version in the Google Docs is pretty final - pending review from other ARG members [especially John Barnes]). Do you no longer persue the route of numbering insertions after line n with n.1 ...? I see in Ada 2022: 37 Optional advice given to the implementer. The word “should” is used to indicate that the advice is a recommendation, not a requirement. It is implementation defined whether or not a given recommendation is obeyed. 38 NOTE Notes emphasize consequences of the rules described in the (sub)clause or elsewhere. This material is informative. Examples 39 Examples illustrate the possible forms of the constructs described. This material is informative. Now in Ada 202y; 37 Optional advice given to the implementer. The word “should” is used to indicate that the advice is a recommendation, not a requirement. It is implementation defined whether or not a given recommendation is obeyed. Usage 38 (37.1) Advice and notes on the usage of Ada programming language. This material is informative. 39(38) NOTE Notes emphasize consequences of the rules described in the (sub)clause or elsewhere. This material is informative. Examples 40(39) Examples illustrate the possible forms of the constructs described. This material is informative.
