Hi, On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 05:02:40PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 25/12/2014 10:39, Job Snijders wrote: > > So you are using a terrible amount of handwaving and overbreathing to > > suggest that we refrain from ASN Assignment policy changes until the AGM > > decides to start charging a yearly fee for ASNs again? > > > > What if such a yaerly fee is never introduced? > > As a more general issue, we need to accept as a community that there is a > crossover between RIPE Community policy and RIPE NCC membership policy, and > that this is one of those intersections. [..] > All things considered, there's not a major problem living with the current > policy formulation for another 12 months if that's what it takes to fix the > policy properly.
So your suggestion would be to stall this proposal until we know what
comes out of the next AGM, and then see if we need the clause in question
at all, anymore?
What if the AGM decides to bring back a yearly recurring charge for ASNs,
we loosen up our policy, the AGM decides to remove the charge once again,
and Nick No Hats decides to send in 4 billion ASN requests to the NCC
(I recall that it was you initially who was worried about the potential
for abuse here, so I'm slightly confused what to make out of this now)?
Given that we only have indirect influence on the AGM decisions, I can
see why the proposers wanted to have a safety net in the parts we get
to control...
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpimtJLtbFmg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
