What from this quotation is? Please give me a link. And what statement exactly of the current policy is abusing?
Also I would like to receive concrete answer to the question: Why using multiple /22's for own company is not abusing but selling is abusing? If anybody from members want to forbid /22 selling let's forbid multiple /22 receiving at all! It would be fair regarding all other members! And because current proposal REMAINS hole for receiving ANY number of /22 for own company I have all reasons to think that current proposal has it's ONLY aim to make life harder for members that want to sell their /22's. 23.04.2015, 16:12, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:05:46PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> OK. Let's it's welcome side effect. >> >> Please answer me the following question: >> >> What reasoning (not purpose) has current proposal? > "The RIPE NCC discovered that people are abusing the current policy" > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
