Hi all, I said I'd stay out of this "discussion" as there was a lot of back and forth on it and it seems to have been getting quite heated. That said ...
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:16:23PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > (And, as a call for order: further personal attacks on the personal > integrity of a proposer will not help bring forward your argument. If > you do not like a proposal, bring forth factual arguments that people > can answer - personal attacks will just disqualify your voice when the > chairs go about judging consensus) I have to endorse this statement fully. As a relative newbie participant in the APWG, I think this has to be the most important point. If someone brings a proposal to the community (for whatever their reason) it shouldn't give people the right to defame or question their integrity. Certainly question the proposal and write a counter proposal but why choose to single out the individual that's raise the proposal to question their intent. You/we either agree with the proposal or we don't. Simple - that's how I see it anyway. Peace out... -- Mick O'Donovan | Network Engineer | BT Ireland | Website: http://www.btireland.net Looking Glass: http://lg.as2110.net Peering Record: http://as2110.peeringdb.com AS-SET Macro: AS-BTIRE | ASN: 2110
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
