This is a good example of a potential bad side effect of the policy > -----Original Message----- > In all the recent 'upheaval' it may have escaped notice that the > proposal *still* does not address the non-speculative case of a LIR > being bought / merged before the 24 month holding period expires. > > rgds, > Sascha Luck >
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Petr Umelov
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Gert Doering
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Elvis Daniel Velea
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Petr Umelov
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Gert Doering
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Infinity Telecom SRL
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Tra... Milton L Mueller
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirement... Infinity Telecom SRL
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirement... Sascha Luck [ml]
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Require... Milton L Mueller
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for... Petr Umelov
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirement... Erik Bais - A2B Internet
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for... Petr Umelov
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirement... Carlos Friacas
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Require... Vladimir Andreev
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Req... Carlos Friacas
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer... Vladimir Andreev
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Tra... Jetten Raymond
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Tra... Gavin Henry
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Tra... Carlos Friacas
