On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:45:52AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Organisations may qualify for an initial allocation greater than
/29 by submitting documentation that reasonably justifies the
request. If so, the allocation size will be based on the number
of users, the extent of the organisation's infrastructure, the
hierarchical and geographical structuring of the organisation,
the segmentation of infrastructure for security and the planned
longevity of allocation." -------------------- end
I support the proposal as-is, without any list of "allowed"
parameters, for those reasons:
1) I doubt we can come up with an exhaustive list of parameters
for request evaluation and so we will be here again next year
when there will be an edge case not catered for.
2) Both the current and the here proposed list are biased towards
conservationism, where ripe-641 explicitly states that
aggregation is the greater good.
rgds,
Sascha Luck
