On 12 Jun 2015, at 09:10, [email protected] wrote: > But to my understanding how things works here, Chair can not declare > consensus if there are still people disagree(and in this case, real or fake, > many of them)
You're wrong. The generally accepted definition of consensus is lack of sustained, reasonable objection. This does not mean everyone has to agree: that's unanimity. A consensus determination does not mean there are no objections either. Some people may well disagree with a proposal. That does not give them a veto on the proposal and their objection(s) don't necessarily block the WG from reaching consensus. I suggest you read RFC7282. Although this documents how the IETF defines consensus, much of that applies to other similar organisations and communities such as RIPE.
